fusion: be preferred over fission

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents style
Weight: 0.61
, method
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, process
Weight: 0.54
Siblings modern dance
Weight: 0.33
, diffusion
Weight: 0.32
, punk rock
Weight: 0.32
, alternative rock
Weight: 0.32
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be preferred over fission 1.00
be better than fission 0.93
be more difficult than fission 0.91
be more powerful than fission 0.91
produce more energy than fission 0.90
be more efficient than fission 0.90
be safer than fission 0.89
be harder than fission 0.89
be cleaner than fission 0.89
differ fundamentally from nuclear fission 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(fusion, be preferred over fission)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fusion, be more difficult than fission)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fusion, be safer than fission)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fusion, be more efficient than fission)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fusion, produce more energy than fission)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(fusion, be better than fission)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fusion, be more powerful than fission)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(fusion, be more powerful than fission)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(fusion, be safer than fission)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fusion, be cleaner than fission)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(fusion, be cleaner than fission)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(fusion, be more difficult than fission)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fusion, be better than fission)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(fusion, be better than fission)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fusion, differ fundamentally from nuclear fission)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(fusion, be cleaner than fission)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(fusion, be harder than fission)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(fusion, be more efficient than fission)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fusion, be safer than fission)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(fusion, be more difficult than fission)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(fusion, differ fundamentally from nuclear fission)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(fusion, produce more energy than fission)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fusion, differ fundamentally from nuclear fission)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fusion, be safer than fission)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fusion, differ fundamentally from nuclear fission)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fusion, be more efficient than fission)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fusion, be more difficult than fission)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fusion, be better than fission)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fusion, be more efficient than fission)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(fusion, be more powerful than fission)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fusion, produce more energy than fission)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fusion, produce more energy than fission)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fusion, be cleaner than fission)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(fusion, be harder than fission)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fusion, be harder than fission)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fusion, be harder than fission)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fusion, be more powerful than fission)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fusion, be preferred over fission)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fusion, be preferred over fission)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fusion, be preferred over fission)