fusion: is endothermic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents style
Weight: 0.61
, method
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, process
Weight: 0.54
Siblings modern dance
Weight: 0.33
, diffusion
Weight: 0.32
, punk rock
Weight: 0.32
, alternative rock
Weight: 0.32
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is endothermic 1.00
is endothermic process 0.94
is exothermic 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(process, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(fusion, is endothermic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(fusion, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(process, is endothermic)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fusion, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(process, is endothermic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(process, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(fusion, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(fusion, is endothermic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(fusion, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(fusion, is endothermic)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fusion, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(fusion, is endothermic process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(fusion, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fusion, is endothermic process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(fusion, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fusion, is endothermic process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(fusion, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fusion, is endothermic process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fusion, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(fusion, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fusion, is endothermic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(fusion, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(fusion, is endothermic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fusion, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(process, is endothermic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(fusion, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(process, is endothermic)