futurama: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents show
Weight: 0.57
, television show
Weight: 0.50
, example
Weight: 0.48
, cartoon
Weight: 0.47
, tv show
Weight: 0.44
Siblings talk show
Weight: 0.29
, game show
Weight: 0.28
, soap opera
Weight: 0.28
, fresh air
Weight: 0.28
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
have good quality 0.98
has quality bad 0.96
have quality 0.92
is quality 0.91
be good for health 0.80
be in great shape now 0.80
feel good 0.80
be good for us 0.80
be in great shape 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(futurama, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(futurama, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(show, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cartoon, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fresh air, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fresh air, be good for us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fresh air, be good for health)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fresh air, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(futurama, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(futurama, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(big bang theory, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fresh air, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fresh air, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(talk show, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fresh air, be good for health)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(fresh air, be good for health)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(fresh air, feel good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fresh air, feel good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fresh air, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(fresh air, be good for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(futurama, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(futurama, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(futurama, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(futurama, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(futurama, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(show, is quality)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cartoon, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fresh air, feel good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fresh air, be good for health)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(talk show, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fresh air, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fresh air, be good for us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cartoon, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(futurama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(show, is quality)