gaff: is underwear amazon

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.48
, item
Weight: 0.42
, gear
Weight: 0.35
, hook
Weight: 0.34
, weapon
Weight: 0.29
Siblings mistake
Weight: 0.30
, nail clipper
Weight: 0.30
, joke
Weight: 0.30
, irony
Weight: 0.30
, shame
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is underwear amazon 1.00
is underwear work 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(gaff, is underwear amazon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(gaff, is underwear amazon)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(gaff, is underwear amazon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gaff, is underwear work)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gaff, is underwear amazon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(gaff, is underwear work)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(gaff, is underwear amazon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(gaff, is underwear work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(gaff, is underwear amazon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(gaff, is underwear work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(gaff, is underwear amazon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gaff, is underwear amazon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gaff, is underwear amazon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(gaff, is underwear amazon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gaff, is underwear amazon)