gain: be measured in db

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.57
, control
Weight: 0.56
, reduction
Weight: 0.56
, amount
Weight: 0.56
Siblings loss
Weight: 0.61
, ordinary
Weight: 0.46
, accretion
Weight: 0.46
, increase
Weight: 0.33
, operating expense
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be measured in db 1.00
be in db 0.94
be measured 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cost, be measured)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(gain, be measured in db)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gain, be measured in db)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(cost, be measured)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(gain, be measured in db)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cost, be measured)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cost, be measured)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(gain, be measured in db)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(gain, be measured in db)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gain, be measured in db)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(gain, be measured in db)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(gain, be measured in db)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gain, be in db)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(gain, be measured in db)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(gain, be in db)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(gain, be measured in db)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(gain, be in db)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gain, be measured in db)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(gain, be in db)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(gain, be measured in db)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(gain, be measured in db)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(gain, be measured in db)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gain, be measured in db)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(gain, be measured in db)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(gain, be measured in db)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cost, be measured)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(gain, be measured in db)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cost, be measured)