gain: be on sale subtracted

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.57
, control
Weight: 0.56
, reduction
Weight: 0.56
, amount
Weight: 0.56
Siblings loss
Weight: 0.61
, ordinary
Weight: 0.46
, accretion
Weight: 0.46
, increase
Weight: 0.33
, operating expense
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on sale subtracted 1.00
be subtracted from income 0.90
be subtracted from cash flows 0.87
be subtracted from net income 0.87
be on sale added 0.79
be on sale 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale added)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(loss, be on sale added)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(loss, be on sale added)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(loss, be on sale)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(loss, be on sale)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(gain, be on sale subtracted)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(gain, be subtracted from income)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(gain, be subtracted from income)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from income)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from net income)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from income)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(gain, be subtracted from net income)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(gain, be on sale)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(gain, be subtracted from net income)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(gain, be on sale)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from net income)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(gain, be on sale)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(gain, be on sale)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(gain, be on sale subtracted)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(gain, be on sale subtracted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale added)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(gain, be on sale subtracted)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale)