gain: be subtracted from cash flows

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.57
, control
Weight: 0.56
, reduction
Weight: 0.56
, amount
Weight: 0.56
Siblings loss
Weight: 0.61
, ordinary
Weight: 0.46
, accretion
Weight: 0.46
, increase
Weight: 0.33
, operating expense
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be subtracted from cash flows 1.00
be subtracted from income 0.90
be on sale subtracted 0.87
be subtracted from net income 0.87
be on sale of equipment cash flows 0.84
be in inventory decrease cash flow 0.82
be in cash 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in inventory decrease cash flow)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in cash)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(increase, be in cash)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(increase, be in cash)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(increase, be in inventory decrease cash flow)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(increase, be in inventory decrease cash flow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(gain, be subtracted from income)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(gain, be subtracted from income)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from income)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from income)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from net income)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(gain, be on sale subtracted)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(gain, be subtracted from net income)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(gain, be on sale subtracted)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(gain, be on sale subtracted)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(gain, be subtracted from net income)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from net income)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(gain, be on sale subtracted)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(gain, be on sale of equipment cash flows)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(gain, be on sale of equipment cash flows)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gain, be on sale of equipment cash flows)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(gain, be on sale of equipment cash flows)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(increase, be in inventory decrease cash flow)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(increase, be in cash)