gain: be subtracted from income

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.57
, control
Weight: 0.56
, reduction
Weight: 0.56
, amount
Weight: 0.56
Siblings loss
Weight: 0.61
, ordinary
Weight: 0.46
, accretion
Weight: 0.46
, increase
Weight: 0.33
, operating expense
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be subtracted from income 1.00
be subtracted from net income 0.97
be on sale subtracted 0.90
be subtracted from cash flows 0.90
be in income 0.82
be considered income 0.82
be in property taxes paid 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(reduction, be considered income)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from income)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(reduction, be considered income)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(reduction, be considered income)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in property taxes paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in income)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(reduction, be considered income)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(gain, be subtracted from income)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(increase, be in income)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(increase, be in income)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(increase, be in property taxes paid)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(increase, be in property taxes paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(gain, be subtracted from income)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from net income)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(gain, be subtracted from net income)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(gain, be on sale subtracted)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(gain, be on sale subtracted)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(gain, be on sale subtracted)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(gain, be subtracted from net income)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(gain, be on sale subtracted)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from net income)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from income)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from income)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(reduction, be considered income)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(increase, be in income)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(increase, be in property taxes paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(gain, be subtracted from income)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(reduction, be considered income)