gain: be subtracted from net income

Related concepts

Parents	cost Weight: 0.57 , control Weight: 0.56 , reduction Weight: 0.56 , amount Weight: 0.56
Siblings	loss Weight: 0.61 , ordinary Weight: 0.46 , accretion Weight: 0.46 , increase Weight: 0.33 , operating expense Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be subtracted from net income	1.00
be subtracted from income	0.97
be subtracted from cash flows	0.87
be on sale subtracted	0.87
be in income	0.84
be considered income	0.83
be in assets recorded as debits	0.75
affect income statement	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(reduction, be considered income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from net income)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(reduction, be considered income)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(reduction, be considered income)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in assets recorded as debits)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(loss, affect income statement)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in income)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(reduction, be considered income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(gain, be subtracted from net income)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(increase, be in income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(increase, be in income)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(loss, affect income statement) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(loss, affect income statement)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(increase, be in assets recorded as debits) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(increase, be in assets recorded as debits)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(gain, be subtracted from net income)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(gain, be subtracted from income)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from income)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(gain, be subtracted from income)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from income)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(gain, be on sale subtracted)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from cash flows)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(gain, be on sale subtracted)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(gain, be on sale subtracted)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(gain, be on sale subtracted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from net income)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(gain, be subtracted from net income)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(reduction, be considered income)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(increase, be in income)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(loss, affect income statement)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(increase, be in assets recorded as debits)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(gain, be subtracted from net income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(reduction, be considered income)