gambling: be illegal in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, addiction
Weight: 0.61
, habit
Weight: 0.61
, diversion
Weight: 0.59
Siblings betting
Weight: 0.35
, poker
Weight: 0.35
, pornography
Weight: 0.34
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in australia 1.00
be in australia 0.92
be banned in australia 0.91
be high in australia 0.89
be illegal in texas 0.82
be legal in usa 0.80
be banned in usa 0.80
be illegal 0.80
bad in usa 0.79
be in uk 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(poker, be illegal in australia)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(poker, be banned in australia)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(poker, be illegal in texas)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pornography, be legal in usa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(poker, be illegal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(poker, bad in usa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(poker, be banned in usa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(betting, be in uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(poker, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(poker, be illegal in australia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(poker, be banned in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(poker, be banned in australia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(pornography, be legal in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pornography, be legal in usa)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(poker, be illegal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(poker, be illegal in texas)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(betting, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(betting, be in uk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(poker, bad in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(poker, bad in usa)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(poker, be banned in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(poker, be banned in usa)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(poker, be illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(poker, be illegal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(gambling, be illegal in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(gambling, be in australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(gambling, be in australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(gambling, be in uk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(gambling, be in australia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(gambling, be in uk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(gambling, be in uk)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(gambling, be illegal in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(poker, be illegal in australia)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(pornography, be legal in usa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(poker, be illegal in texas)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(poker, be banned in australia)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(betting, be in uk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(poker, bad in usa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(poker, be illegal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(poker, be banned in usa)