gambling: be in california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, addiction
Weight: 0.61
, habit
Weight: 0.61
, diversion
Weight: 0.59
Siblings betting
Weight: 0.35
, poker
Weight: 0.35
, pornography
Weight: 0.34
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in california 1.00
be in utah 0.81
be in florida 0.81
be in texas 0.80
be high in florida 0.80
be in usa 0.80
bad in usa 0.80
be in minnesota 0.79
be in america 0.79
be in hawaii 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(poker, bad in usa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(betting, be in america)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(poker, bad in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(poker, bad in usa)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(betting, be in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(betting, be in america)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(gambling, be in california)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(gambling, be in usa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gambling, be in utah)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(gambling, be in usa)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(gambling, be in hawaii)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(gambling, be in minnesota)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(gambling, be in florida)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(gambling, be in texas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(gambling, be in hawaii)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(gambling, be in hawaii)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in hawaii)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(gambling, be in usa)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gambling, be in utah)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in minnesota)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(gambling, be in minnesota)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(gambling, be in minnesota)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(gambling, be in texas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(gambling, be in utah)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(gambling, be in florida)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in texas)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in florida)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in usa)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(gambling, be in texas)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(gambling, be in florida)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in utah)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gambling, be in california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(poker, bad in usa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(betting, be in america)