gambling: be in new york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, addiction
Weight: 0.61
, habit
Weight: 0.61
, diversion
Weight: 0.59
Siblings betting
Weight: 0.35
, poker
Weight: 0.35
, pornography
Weight: 0.34
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in new york 1.00
be in york 0.98
be high in new orleans 0.79
be in london 0.76
be in up london 0.76
be in chicago 0.75
be high in london 0.75
be in up chicago 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(gambling, be in new york)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(crime, be high in london)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(gambling, be in new york)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(crime, be in up london)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(gambling, be in new york)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(crime, be in up london)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in london)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(crime, be in london)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in up london)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in london)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in london)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(gambling, be in new york)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(crime, be high in london)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(gambling, be in new york)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(crime, be in up london)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(gambling, be in new york)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(gambling, be in new york)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(gambling, be in york)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(gambling, be in york)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in york)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(gambling, be in york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(gambling, be in new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(crime, be in up london)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crime, be high in london)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crime, be in london)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(crime, be in up london)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crime, be high in london)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(gambling, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crime, be in london)