gambling: be on indian reservations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, addiction
Weight: 0.61
, habit
Weight: 0.61
, diversion
Weight: 0.59
Siblings betting
Weight: 0.35
, poker
Weight: 0.35
, pornography
Weight: 0.34
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on indian reservations 1.00
be legal on indian reservations 0.97
be on reservations 0.91
be legal on reservations 0.87
be on indian land 0.85
be on indian land considered 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(crime, be on indian land considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(gambling, be on indian reservations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(crime, be on indian land considered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(crime, be on indian land considered)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(crime, be on indian land considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(gambling, be on indian reservations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(gambling, be on indian reservations)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be legal on indian reservations)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(gambling, be legal on indian reservations)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(gambling, be legal on indian reservations)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(gambling, be legal on indian reservations)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(gambling, be legal on reservations)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be legal on reservations)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(gambling, be legal on reservations)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(gambling, be legal on reservations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be on indian reservations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(gambling, be on indian reservations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(crime, be on indian land considered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(gambling, be on indian reservations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(crime, be on indian land considered)