gamma ray: be harmful to living things

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ray
Weight: 0.80
, photon
Weight: 0.78
, particle
Weight: 0.69
, wave
Weight: 0.69
, wavelength
Weight: 0.67
Siblings neutrino
Weight: 0.47
, manta ray
Weight: 0.40
, alpha particle
Weight: 0.37
, beta particle
Weight: 0.36
, light
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful to living things 1.00
be harmful to things 0.93
be harmful 0.87
be harmful to life-forms 0.87
is harmful 0.86
is is can harmful 0.85
is most harmful 0.85
be dangerous to living organisms 0.84
be harmful to person 0.84
be harmful to humans 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(ray, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(ray, is harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ray, is harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(alpha particle, is harmful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(ray, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(alpha particle, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(alpha particle, is harmful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to things)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(gamma ray, be harmful to things)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be harmful to things)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to life-forms)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to person)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, is is can harmful)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be dangerous to living organisms)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to things)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(gamma ray, be harmful to life-forms)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(gamma ray, be dangerous to living organisms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(gamma ray, be harmful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(gamma ray, be harmful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(gamma ray, is is can harmful)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(gamma ray, be harmful to humans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(gamma ray, be harmful to person)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, be dangerous to living organisms)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to life-forms)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, is is can harmful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be dangerous to living organisms)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(gamma ray, is is can harmful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to humans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be harmful to humans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be harmful to life-forms)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to person)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be harmful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be harmful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be harmful to person)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(ray, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(alpha particle, is harmful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(gamma ray, be harmful to living things)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(ray, is harmful)