gamma: have dangerous rays

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.54
, setting
Weight: 0.53
, parameter
Weight: 0.52
, item
Weight: 0.48
Siblings gamma radiation
Weight: 0.35
, amplitude
Weight: 0.34
, frequency
Weight: 0.33
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, compression
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have dangerous rays 1.00
has physical part rays 0.91
has shape rays 0.91
be rays from space 0.90
is dangerous 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(gamma radiation, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(gamma radiation, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(gamma, have dangerous rays)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(gamma, be rays from space)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(gamma, has shape rays)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(gamma, has physical part rays)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(gamma, be rays from space)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(gamma, has shape rays)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gamma, be rays from space)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(gamma, has physical part rays)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(gamma, has physical part rays)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(gamma, has physical part rays)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(gamma, has shape rays)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(gamma, has shape rays)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(gamma, is dangerous)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(gamma, be rays from space)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(gamma, is dangerous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(gamma, is dangerous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(gamma, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gamma, have dangerous rays)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(gamma, have dangerous rays)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gamma, have dangerous rays)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(gamma radiation, is dangerous)