gang: fight for territory

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, group
Weight: 0.60
, organization
Weight: 0.60
, influence
Weight: 0.56
Siblings mafia
Weight: 0.73
, cartel
Weight: 0.46
, terrorist organization
Weight: 0.34
, robbery
Weight: 0.34
, arson
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
fight for territory 1.00
fight 0.80
is territorial 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(gang, fight for territory)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cartel, fight)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(gang, fight for territory)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(cartel, fight)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(cartel, fight)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(gang, fight for territory)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(gang, fight for territory)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(gang, fight for territory)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(gang, fight)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(gang, fight for territory)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(gang, fight)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(gang, fight for territory)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(gang, fight)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(gang, fight for territory)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(gang, is territorial)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(gang, fight for territory)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gang, is territorial)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(gang, fight for territory)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(gang, is territorial)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(gang, fight for territory)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(gang, fight)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(gang, fight for territory)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(gang, is territorial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(gang, fight for territory)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gang, fight for territory)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(gang, fight for territory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(gang, fight for territory)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gang, fight for territory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(gang, fight for territory)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(cartel, fight)