gang: has state problem

Related concepts

Parents	crime Weight: 0.65 , problem Weight: 0.60 , group Weight: 0.60 , organization Weight: 0.60 , influence Weight: 0.56
Siblings	mafia Weight: 0.73 , cartel Weight: 0.46 , terrorist organization Weight: 0.34 , robbery Weight: 0.34 , arson Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has state problem	1.00
be problem in society	0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(gang, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(gang, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(crime, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(gang, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(crime, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(gang, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(gang, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(gang, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(gang, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(robbery, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(gang, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(gang, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(gang, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(gang, be problem in society)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(gang, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(gang, be problem in society)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(gang, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(gang, be problem in society)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(gang, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(gang, be problem in society)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(gang, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(gang, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(gang, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(gang, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(gang, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(gang, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(gang, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(gang, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)