garbage: be bad for earth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents waste
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, mess
Weight: 0.58
Siblings human waste
Weight: 0.66
, banana peel
Weight: 0.58
, litter
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for earth 1.00
be covered with layers of earth of earth 0.83
be bad in ocean 0.81
affect planet 0.79
be bad for environment 0.78
has quality bad 0.76
be covered with layers of earth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(waste, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for earth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for earth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(waste, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(waste, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(litter, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(waste, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(garbage, be bad for earth)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(garbage, be bad for earth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(human waste, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(litter, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(litter, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(garbage, be bad for earth)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(garbage, be covered with layers of earth of earth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect planet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(garbage, affect planet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(garbage, be covered with layers of earth of earth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad in ocean)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(garbage, be covered with layers of earth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(garbage, affect planet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(garbage, be bad in ocean)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect planet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(garbage, be bad in ocean)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(garbage, be covered with layers of earth of earth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad in ocean)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(garbage, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(garbage, be covered with layers of earth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(garbage, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be covered with layers of earth of earth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(garbage, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be covered with layers of earth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(garbage, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(garbage, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(garbage, be covered with layers of earth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for earth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(waste, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(waste, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(human waste, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(litter, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(waste, be bad for environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(garbage, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(waste, has quality bad)