garbage: be covered at landfills

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents waste
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, mess
Weight: 0.58
Siblings human waste
Weight: 0.66
, banana peel
Weight: 0.58
, litter
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be covered at landfills 1.00
buried in landfill cause pollution 0.85
buried in landfill cause pollution water supply 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(garbage, be covered at landfills)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(garbage, be covered at landfills)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(garbage, be covered at landfills)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(garbage, be covered at landfills)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(garbage, be covered at landfills)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(garbage, be covered at landfills)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(garbage, be covered at landfills)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(garbage, be covered at landfills)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(garbage, be covered at landfills)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(garbage, be covered at landfills)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(garbage, be covered at landfills)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(garbage, be covered at landfills)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be covered at landfills)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(garbage, be covered at landfills)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(garbage, be covered at landfills)