garbage: be covered with layers of earth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents waste
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, mess
Weight: 0.58
Siblings human waste
Weight: 0.66
, banana peel
Weight: 0.58
, litter
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be covered with layers of earth 1.00
be covered with layers of earth of earth 0.98
be covered with layers 0.96
be bad for earth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(garbage, be covered with layers of earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(garbage, be covered with layers of earth)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(garbage, be covered with layers of earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(garbage, be covered with layers of earth of earth)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(garbage, be covered with layers of earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(garbage, be covered with layers of earth of earth)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(garbage, be covered with layers of earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be covered with layers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(garbage, be covered with layers of earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be covered with layers of earth of earth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(garbage, be covered with layers of earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(garbage, be covered with layers of earth of earth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(garbage, be covered with layers of earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(garbage, be covered with layers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(garbage, be covered with layers of earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for earth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(garbage, be covered with layers of earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(garbage, be bad for earth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(garbage, be covered with layers of earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(garbage, be bad for earth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(garbage, be covered with layers of earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(garbage, be covered with layers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(garbage, be covered with layers of earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for earth)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(garbage, be covered with layers of earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(garbage, be covered with layers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(garbage, be covered with layers of earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(garbage, be covered with layers of earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be covered with layers of earth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(garbage, be covered with layers of earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(garbage, be covered with layers of earth)