garbage: be problem in community

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents waste
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, mess
Weight: 0.58
Siblings human waste
Weight: 0.66
, banana peel
Weight: 0.58
, litter
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in community 1.00
has state problem 0.85
be major problem 0.82
be patch problem 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(waste, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(garbage, be problem in community)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(waste, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(waste, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(litter, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(human waste, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(waste, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(garbage, be problem in community)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(human waste, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(human waste, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(litter, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(litter, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(garbage, be problem in community)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(garbage, has state problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(garbage, be patch problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(garbage, be major problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(garbage, be patch problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(garbage, has state problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(garbage, has state problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be patch problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(garbage, be patch problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(garbage, be major problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(garbage, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(garbage, be major problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be major problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be problem in community)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(garbage, be problem in community)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(waste, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(human waste, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(litter, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(garbage, be problem in community)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(waste, has state problem)