garlic: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.68
, seasoning
Weight: 0.68
, herb
Weight: 0.67
, crop
Weight: 0.65
, spice
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cinnamon
Weight: 0.38
, basil
Weight: 0.38
, fennel
Weight: 0.38
, thyme
Weight: 0.38
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
be bad for sibo 0.86
be good for pcos 0.81
go bad 0.79
taste good 0.77
has quality resources 0.76
be good for us 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(seasoning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(garlic, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(garlic, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(herb, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(garlic, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(garlic, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(garlic, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(garlic, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(spice, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(garlic, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(spice, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(spice, go bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(spice, taste good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(seasoning, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(spice, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(herb, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(seasoning, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(spice, go bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(herb, taste good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spice, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(fennel, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fennel, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(basil, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, be good for pcos)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fennel, is quality)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, be good for us)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(seasoning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(garlic, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(garlic, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(herb, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(garlic, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(garlic, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(garlic, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(garlic, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(spice, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(garlic, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(fennel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fennel, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fennel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(fennel, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(basil, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(basil, go bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fennel, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fennel, is quality)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cinnamon, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, taste good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cinnamon, be good for pcos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cinnamon, be good for pcos)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cinnamon, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cinnamon, be good for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(garlic, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(garlic, go bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(garlic, be bad for sibo)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(garlic, go bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(garlic, go bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(garlic, be bad for sibo)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(garlic, go bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(garlic, be bad for sibo)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(garlic, be bad for sibo)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(garlic, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(garlic, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(garlic, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(garlic, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(spice, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(seasoning, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(spice, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spice, go bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(spice, taste good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(herb, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fennel, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fennel, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cinnamon, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(basil, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fennel, is quality)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cinnamon, be good for pcos)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, taste good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cinnamon, be good for us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(spice, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spice, go bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(seasoning, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(spice, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(spice, taste good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(garlic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(herb, taste good)