garnet: be associate with kimberlite

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mineral
Weight: 0.70
, gem
Weight: 0.68
, stone
Weight: 0.65
, color
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.47
Siblings quartz
Weight: 0.36
, ruby
Weight: 0.36
, diamond
Weight: 0.35
, sapphire
Weight: 0.35
, tungsten
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be associate with kimberlite 1.00
be at pegmatite 0.85
be at ore 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mineral, be at ore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(garnet, be associate with kimberlite)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(garnet, be associate with kimberlite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mineral, be at ore)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(garnet, be associate with kimberlite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mineral, be at ore)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(garnet, be associate with kimberlite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be at pegmatite)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mineral, be at ore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(garnet, be associate with kimberlite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(garnet, be associate with kimberlite)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(garnet, be associate with kimberlite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(quartz, be at pegmatite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(quartz, be at pegmatite)

Salient implies Plausible

0.00
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(garnet, be associate with kimberlite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(garnet, be associate with kimberlite)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(garnet, be associate with kimberlite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(garnet, be associate with kimberlite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(garnet, be associate with kimberlite)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(garnet, be associate with kimberlite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(garnet, be associate with kimberlite)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(garnet, be associate with kimberlite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mineral, be at ore)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(garnet, be associate with kimberlite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(quartz, be at pegmatite)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(garnet, be associate with kimberlite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mineral, be at ore)