gathering: be important part of scientific process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meeting
Weight: 0.67
, event
Weight: 0.65
, function
Weight: 0.57
, day
Weight: 0.54
Siblings birthday party
Weight: 0.71
, picnic
Weight: 0.66
, retreat
Weight: 0.63
, convention
Weight: 0.61
, conference
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important part of scientific process 1.00
be important part of process 0.89
be important to scientific inquiry 0.81
be such as important in forensic science 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(function, be such as important in forensic science)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(gathering, be important part of scientific process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(function, be such as important in forensic science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(function, be such as important in forensic science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(function, be such as important in forensic science)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(gathering, be important part of scientific process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(gathering, be important part of scientific process)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(gathering, be important part of process)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(gathering, be important part of process)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(gathering, be important part of process)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(gathering, be important to scientific inquiry)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(gathering, be important to scientific inquiry)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(gathering, be important to scientific inquiry)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gathering, be important part of process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(gathering, be important to scientific inquiry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(gathering, be important part of scientific process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(gathering, be important part of scientific process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(function, be such as important in forensic science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(gathering, be important part of scientific process)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(function, be such as important in forensic science)