gay men: be more fit than men

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more fit than men 1.00
be more fit than straight men 0.94
be more well-dressed than men 0.89
be more well-dressed than other men 0.88
be different than men 0.87
be much better than women 0.84
work out more than straight men 0.83
be more responsible than men 0.82
be sexier than men 0.82
be different than straight men 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(gay men, be more fit than men)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(gay men, be more well-dressed than men)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(gay men, be different than men)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(gay men, be more well-dressed than men)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(gay men, be different than men)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(gay men, work out more than straight men)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(gay men, be more responsible than men)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(gay men, be sexier than men)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(gay men, work out more than straight men)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(gay men, work out more than straight men)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(gay men, be more well-dressed than men)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(gay men, be more responsible than men)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(gay men, be different than men)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(gay men, work out more than straight men)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(gay men, be sexier than men)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(gay men, be more well-dressed than men)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(gay men, be more responsible than men)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(gay men, be different than men)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(gay men, be more responsible than men)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(gay men, be sexier than men)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(gay men, be sexier than men)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gay men, be more fit than men)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(gay men, be more fit than men)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(gay men, be more fit than men)