gazelle: be at big field

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, prey
Weight: 0.59
, antelope
Weight: 0.58
, animal
Weight: 0.57
, wildlife
Weight: 0.50
Siblings cheetah
Weight: 0.36
, rhino
Weight: 0.35
, zebra
Weight: 0.35
, hare
Weight: 0.35
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at big field 1.00
be at open field 0.84
be big or small 0.81
be born small and then get big 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be big or small) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(gazelle, be at big field)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(gazelle, be at big field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(animal, be big or small)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, be at big field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(animal, be big or small)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be big or small) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(gazelle, be at big field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(gazelle, be at big field)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(gazelle, be at big field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(gazelle, be at big field)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(gazelle, be at big field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(gazelle, be at open field)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(gazelle, be at big field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(gazelle, be at open field)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(gazelle, be at big field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(gazelle, be at open field)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(gazelle, be at big field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, be at open field)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(gazelle, be at big field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(gazelle, be at big field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, be at big field)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(gazelle, be at big field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(gazelle, be at big field)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gazelle, be at big field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(animal, be big or small)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(gazelle, be at big field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(animal, be big or small)