general election: be without rights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vote
Weight: 0.69
, election
Weight: 0.65
, candidate
Weight: 0.65
, primary
Weight: 0.64
Siblings turnout
Weight: 0.54
, delegate
Weight: 0.33
, ballot
Weight: 0.33
, democrat
Weight: 0.33
, third party
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be without rights 1.00
be without voting rights 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(election, be without voting rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(general election, be without rights)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(general election, be without rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(election, be without voting rights)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(general election, be without rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(election, be without voting rights)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(election, be without voting rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(general election, be without rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(general election, be without rights)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(general election, be without rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(general election, be without rights)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(general election, be without rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(general election, be without voting rights)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(general election, be without rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(general election, be without voting rights)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(general election, be without rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(general election, be without voting rights)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(general election, be without rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(general election, be without voting rights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(general election, be without rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(general election, be without rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(general election, be without rights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(general election, be without rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(general election, be without rights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(general election, be without rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(election, be without voting rights)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(general election, be without rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(election, be without voting rights)