general election: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vote
Weight: 0.69
, election
Weight: 0.65
, candidate
Weight: 0.65
, primary
Weight: 0.64
Siblings turnout
Weight: 0.54
, delegate
Weight: 0.33
, ballot
Weight: 0.33
, democrat
Weight: 0.33
, third party
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality function 0.78
is good thing 0.78
has quality evil 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(primary, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(general election, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(primary, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(turnout, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ballot, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(delegate, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(turnout, is good thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(delegate, has quality function)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(primary, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(general election, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ballot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(ballot, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(delegate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(delegate, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(turnout, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(turnout, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(delegate, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(delegate, has quality function)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(turnout, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(turnout, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(general election, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(general election, has quality wrong)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(general election, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(general election, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(primary, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(delegate, has quality function)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(ballot, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(turnout, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(delegate, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(turnout, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(primary, has quality good)