general election: has quality wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vote
Weight: 0.69
, election
Weight: 0.65
, candidate
Weight: 0.65
, primary
Weight: 0.64
Siblings turnout
Weight: 0.54
, delegate
Weight: 0.33
, ballot
Weight: 0.33
, democrat
Weight: 0.33
, third party
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wrong 1.00
has quality good 0.85
happen in new right 0.77
is high right now 0.76
happen in right 0.76
believe as right 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(vote, happen in new right)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(general election, has quality wrong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(primary, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(general election, has quality wrong)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vote, is high right now)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(general election, has quality wrong)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vote, happen in right)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(general election, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(vote, happen in right)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(vote, is high right now)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(primary, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(vote, happen in new right)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(vote, happen in new right)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(vote, happen in right)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(vote, is high right now)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(turnout, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ballot, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(delegate, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(primary, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(vote, happen in new right)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vote, is high right now)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vote, happen in right)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ballot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(ballot, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(delegate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(delegate, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(turnout, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(turnout, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(general election, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(general election, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(general election, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(general election, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(general election, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(vote, is high right now)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(primary, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(vote, happen in right)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vote, happen in new right)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(ballot, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(delegate, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(turnout, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(vote, is high right now)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(vote, happen in right)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(primary, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(general election, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vote, happen in new right)