general: was bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commander
Weight: 0.61
, person
Weight: 0.58
, rank
Weight: 0.58
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.57
, partner
Weight: 0.56
Siblings governor general
Weight: 0.34
, lieutenant general
Weight: 0.34
, manager
Weight: 0.33
, public servant
Weight: 0.32
, deputy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was bad 1.00
was bad general 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(general, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(general, was bad)

Similarity expansion

0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(general, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(general, was bad general)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(general, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(general, was bad general)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(general, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(general, was bad general)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(general, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(general, was bad general)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(general, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(general, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(general, was bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(general, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(general, was bad)