generation: be y referred to to millennials

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents application
Weight: 0.59
, opportunity
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, example
Weight: 0.57
Siblings boomer
Weight: 0.57
, gen
Weight: 0.49
, model
Weight: 0.32
, platform
Weight: 0.32
, phase
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be y referred to to millennials 1.00
be called baby boomers 0.77
is y going 0.77
be called boomer 0.76
is y unhappy 0.76
be called x y z 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(boomer, be called boomer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(boomer, be called boomer)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(boomer, be called boomer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(generation, be y referred to to millennials)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(generation, is y going)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(generation, be called baby boomers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(generation, be called x y z)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(generation, be called x y z)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(generation, be called x y z)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(generation, be called baby boomers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(generation, be called baby boomers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(generation, is y going)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(generation, is y going)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(generation, is y unhappy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(generation, be called x y z)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(generation, is y going)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(generation, is y unhappy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(generation, be called baby boomers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(generation, is y unhappy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(generation, is y unhappy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(generation, be y referred to to millennials)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(generation, be y referred to to millennials)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(generation, be y referred to to millennials)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(boomer, be called boomer)