generation: having sex

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents application
Weight: 0.59
, opportunity
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, example
Weight: 0.57
Siblings boomer
Weight: 0.57
, gen
Weight: 0.49
, model
Weight: 0.32
, platform
Weight: 0.32
, phase
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
having sex 1.00
having less sex 0.96
ask for sex 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(application, ask for sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(generation, having sex)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(generation, having sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(application, ask for sex)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(generation, having sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(application, ask for sex)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(application, ask for sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(generation, having sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(generation, having sex)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(generation, having sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(generation, having sex)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(generation, having sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(generation, having less sex)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(generation, having sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(generation, having less sex)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(generation, having sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(generation, having less sex)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(generation, having sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(generation, having less sex)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(generation, having sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(generation, having sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(generation, having sex)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(generation, having sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(generation, having sex)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(generation, having sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(application, ask for sex)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(generation, having sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(application, ask for sex)