generosity: be evolutionarily selected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents virtue
Weight: 0.65
, trait
Weight: 0.63
, quality
Weight: 0.63
, value
Weight: 0.62
, attribute
Weight: 0.57
Siblings kindness
Weight: 0.38
, compassion
Weight: 0.36
, dedication
Weight: 0.35
, altruism
Weight: 0.35
, courage
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be evolutionarily selected 1.00
be evolutionarily selected for 1.00
have many different phenotypes 0.76
have different phenotypes 0.76
be problem for evolutionary theory 0.75
be controlled by recessive alleles on x chromosome more in males than in females 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(trait, be controlled by recessive alleles on x chromosome more in males than in females)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(trait, have many different phenotypes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(trait, have many different phenotypes)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(trait, be controlled by recessive alleles on x chromosome more in males than in females)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(trait, be controlled by recessive alleles on x chromosome more in males than in females)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(trait, have many different phenotypes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(trait, be controlled by recessive alleles on x chromosome more in males than in females)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(trait, have many different phenotypes)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(trait, have many different phenotypes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(trait, be controlled by recessive alleles on x chromosome more in males than in females)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(trait, have many different phenotypes)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(trait, be controlled by recessive alleles on x chromosome more in males than in females)