generosity: be evolutionarily selected for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents virtue
Weight: 0.65
, trait
Weight: 0.63
, quality
Weight: 0.63
, value
Weight: 0.62
, attribute
Weight: 0.57
Siblings kindness
Weight: 0.38
, compassion
Weight: 0.36
, dedication
Weight: 0.35
, altruism
Weight: 0.35
, courage
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be evolutionarily selected for 1.00
be evolutionarily selected 1.00
be problem for evolutionary theory 0.76
have many different phenotypes 0.76
have different phenotypes 0.76
be controlled by recessive alleles on x chromosome more in males than in females 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(trait, be controlled by recessive alleles on x chromosome more in males than in females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(trait, have many different phenotypes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(trait, have many different phenotypes)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(trait, be controlled by recessive alleles on x chromosome more in males than in females)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(trait, be controlled by recessive alleles on x chromosome more in males than in females)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(trait, have many different phenotypes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(trait, be controlled by recessive alleles on x chromosome more in males than in females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(trait, have many different phenotypes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(trait, have many different phenotypes)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(trait, be controlled by recessive alleles on x chromosome more in males than in females)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(trait, have many different phenotypes)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(trait, be controlled by recessive alleles on x chromosome more in males than in females)