geography: affect culture of area

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, subject
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, culture
Weight: 0.63
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, mathematics
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.34
, biology
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect culture of area 1.00
affect culture of region 0.94
affect micmac culture 0.93
affect culture 0.93
affect ones culture 0.89
affect society 0.81
affect city 0.81
affect development of society 0.81
affect history of group of people 0.79
affect new city 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(biology, affect society)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect culture)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(biology, affect society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(biology, affect society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(geography, affect culture of area)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture of region)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(geography, affect culture)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(geography, affect culture of region)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(geography, affect culture)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(geography, affect culture)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect development of society)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect history of group of people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(geography, affect culture of region)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(geography, affect micmac culture)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(geography, affect culture of region)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(geography, affect development of society)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(geography, affect micmac culture)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(geography, affect history of group of people)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(geography, affect development of society)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(geography, affect history of group of people)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(geography, affect micmac culture)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(geography, affect development of society)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(geography, affect history of group of people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture of area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(geography, affect culture of area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ecology, affect culture)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture of area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(biology, affect society)