geography: affect spread of religion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, subject
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, culture
Weight: 0.63
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, mathematics
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.34
, biology
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect spread of religion 1.00
affect micmac culture 0.79
affect culture 0.79
affect society 0.78
affect people 0.77
affect egyptians 0.77
affects society 0.77
affect way 0.77
affect culture of area 0.76
affect culture of region 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(biology, affect society)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect culture)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(biology, affect society)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(biology, affect society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(geography, affect spread of religion)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(geography, affect culture)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(geography, affect culture of region)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(geography, affect culture)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(geography, affect culture)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(geography, affect culture of area)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(geography, affect people)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(geography, affect micmac culture)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(geography, affect people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(geography, affect culture of region)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(geography, affect culture of region)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(geography, affect culture of area)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(geography, affect culture of area)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(geography, affect people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect people)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(geography, affect micmac culture)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture of area)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture of region)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(geography, affect micmac culture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect spread of religion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(geography, affect spread of religion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ecology, affect culture)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect spread of religion)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(biology, affect society)