geography: be better than history

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, subject
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, culture
Weight: 0.63
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, mathematics
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.34
, biology
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than history 1.00
make history 0.87
be important to history 0.87
be similar to history 0.85
be related to history 0.83
be connected to history 0.80
be relevant in 21st century 0.76
be relevant to needs of third world war 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(science, be related to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(geography, be better than history)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(science, be related to history)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to history)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(science, be related to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(geography, be better than history)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(geography, be better than history)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(geography, make history)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(geography, be important to history)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(geography, make history)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(geography, be similar to history)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, be similar to history)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to history)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(geography, make history)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(geography, make history)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(geography, be connected to history)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(geography, be similar to history)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(geography, be similar to history)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(geography, be connected to history)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(geography, be relevant to needs of third world war)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(geography, be important to history)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(geography, be connected to history)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(geography, be related to history)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(geography, be connected to history)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(geography, be relevant to needs of third world war)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(geography, be related to history)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(geography, be important to history)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(geography, be related to history)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(geography, be relevant to needs of third world war)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(geography, be important to history)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(geography, be relevant to needs of third world war)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(geography, be better than history)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(geography, be better than history)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(science, be related to history)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(geography, be better than history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(science, be related to history)