geography: be considered social science

Related concepts

Parents	science Weight: 0.65 , subject Weight: 0.64 , department Weight: 0.64 , culture Weight: 0.63 , discipline Weight: 0.63
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.36 , mathematics Weight: 0.36 , meteorology Weight: 0.34 , biology Weight: 0.34 , ecology Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered social science	1.00
be called social science	0.97
is social science	0.97
be considered more of social science than science	0.96
be different as social science	0.94
be considered science	0.93
be referred as social science subject	0.89
be different from geography as social science	0.89
be called science	0.88
be part of science	0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(science, be called science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(geography, be considered social science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(science, be called science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(science, be called science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(biology, be called science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(science, be called science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(geography, be considered social science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(computer science, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(biology, be called science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(biology, be called science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(geography, be considered social science)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(geography, be considered more of social science than science)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered more of social science than science)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered science)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(geography, be considered more of social science than science)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(geography, be considered more of social science than science)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(geography, be different from geography as social science)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(geography, be part of science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(geography, be considered science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(geography, be different from geography as social science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(geography, be different from geography as social science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(geography, be part of science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(geography, be part of science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(geography, be considered science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(geography, be considered science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(geography, be different from geography as social science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(geography, be part of science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered social science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(geography, be considered social science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(science, be called science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(biology, be called science)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(ecology, be considered science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(geography, be considered social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(science, be called science)