geography: be related to economics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, subject
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, culture
Weight: 0.63
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, mathematics
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.34
, biology
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to economics 1.00
be related to geography 0.80
be related 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(culture, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(geography, be related to economics)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(science, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(geography, be related to economics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(science, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(culture, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(culture, be related)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(science, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(culture, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(geography, be related to economics)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(science, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(geography, be related to economics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(biology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(biology, be related)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(meteorology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(meteorology, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(geography, be related to economics)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to geography)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(geography, be related to geography)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(geography, be related to geography)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(geography, be related to geography)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(geography, be related)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(geography, be related)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(geography, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to economics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(geography, be related to economics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(science, be related)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(culture, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ecology, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(biology, be related)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(meteorology, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(science, be related)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(geography, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(culture, be related)