geography: be related to geography

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, subject
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, culture
Weight: 0.63
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, mathematics
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.34
, biology
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to geography 1.00
be called geography 0.94
affect physical geography 0.94
was different from nubian geography 0.93
be compared to european geography 0.84
be related to economics 0.80
be related to history 0.79
be related 0.77
be interrelated to history 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(culture, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(geography, be related to geography)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(science, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(geography, be related to geography)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(science, be related to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(geography, be related to geography)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(science, be related to history)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(science, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(culture, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(culture, be related)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to history)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(science, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, be related)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(science, be related to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(geography, be related to geography)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(culture, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(geography, be related to geography)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(science, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(geography, be related to geography)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(biology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(biology, be related)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(meteorology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(meteorology, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(geography, be related to geography)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(geography, be called geography)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(geography, was different from nubian geography)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(geography, be called geography)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect physical geography)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(geography, affect physical geography)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(geography, be called geography)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(geography, be called geography)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(geography, affect physical geography)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(geography, be compared to european geography)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(geography, affect physical geography)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to economics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to history)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(geography, be compared to european geography)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(geography, was different from nubian geography)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(geography, be interrelated to history)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(geography, be compared to european geography)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(geography, be compared to european geography)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(geography, be related to economics)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(geography, be related to history)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(geography, be interrelated to history)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(geography, be related)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(geography, be related to economics)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(geography, was different from nubian geography)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(geography, be related to economics)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(geography, be interrelated to history)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(geography, be interrelated to history)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(geography, be related to history)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(geography, be related)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(geography, be related to history)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(geography, was different from nubian geography)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(geography, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to geography)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(geography, be related to geography)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(science, be related to history)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(science, be related)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(culture, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ecology, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(biology, be related)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(meteorology, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(science, be related to history)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(science, be related)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(geography, be related to geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(culture, be related)