geometric mean: be better than arithmetic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents average
Weight: 0.53
Siblings arithmetic mean
Weight: 0.33
, batting average
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than arithmetic 1.00
be less than arithmetic 0.98
be different from arithmetic 0.96
be useful in math 0.80
relate to math 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(average, be useful in math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(average, relate to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(average, relate to math)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(average, be useful in math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(average, relate to math)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(average, be useful in math)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(average, be useful in math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(average, relate to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(geometric mean, be less than arithmetic)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, be less than arithmetic)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, be different from arithmetic)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(geometric mean, be less than arithmetic)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(geometric mean, be less than arithmetic)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(geometric mean, be different from arithmetic)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(geometric mean, be different from arithmetic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(geometric mean, be different from arithmetic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(average, relate to math)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(average, be useful in math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(average, relate to math)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(geometric mean, be better than arithmetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(average, be useful in math)