geometric mean: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents average
Weight: 0.53
Siblings arithmetic mean
Weight: 0.33
, batting average
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality bad 0.90
has quality wrong 0.83
has quality function 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(geometric mean, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(average, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(geometric mean, has quality better)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(average, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(geometric mean, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(average, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(average, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(average, has quality function)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(average, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(average, has quality wrong)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(average, has quality function)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(batting average, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(average, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(geometric mean, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(average, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(geometric mean, has quality better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(average, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(geometric mean, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(batting average, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(batting average, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(geometric mean, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(geometric mean, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(average, has quality wrong)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(average, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(average, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(batting average, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(average, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(average, has quality wrong)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(geometric mean, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(average, has quality function)