geometry: be related to ancient egypt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.62
, discipline
Weight: 0.60
, course
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cylinder
Weight: 0.54
, chamfer
Weight: 0.46
, ellipsoid
Weight: 0.43
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to ancient egypt 1.00
be important in ancient greece 0.89
was useful in indus valley civilization 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(geometry, be important in ancient greece)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(geometry, be important in ancient greece)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(geometry, be important in ancient greece)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(geometry, be important in ancient greece)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)