geometry: was useful in indus valley civilization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.62
, discipline
Weight: 0.60
, course
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cylinder
Weight: 0.54
, chamfer
Weight: 0.46
, ellipsoid
Weight: 0.43
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was useful in indus valley civilization 1.00
be related to ancient egypt 0.76
be important in ancient greece 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(geometry, be important in ancient greece)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(geometry, be important in ancient greece)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(geometry, be important in ancient greece)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(geometry, be important in ancient greece)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(geometry, be related to ancient egypt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(geometry, was useful in indus valley civilization)