gerbil: be better than hamsters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.65
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, pet
Weight: 0.55
, cat
Weight: 0.46
, reptile
Weight: 0.46
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.35
, hamster
Weight: 0.35
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.35
, llama
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than hamsters 1.00
have mice 0.78
talk to other gerbils 0.78
talk to gerbils 0.77
act funny with other gerbils 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(gerbil, be better than hamsters)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gerbil, have mice)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(gerbil, have mice)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(gerbil, have mice)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(gerbil, talk to gerbils)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(gerbil, talk to other gerbils)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have mice)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(gerbil, act funny with other gerbils)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(gerbil, talk to gerbils)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(gerbil, talk to other gerbils)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, talk to other gerbils)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(gerbil, talk to gerbils)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(gerbil, act funny with other gerbils)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, act funny with other gerbils)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, talk to gerbils)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(gerbil, talk to other gerbils)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(gerbil, act funny with other gerbils)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, be better than hamsters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gerbil, be better than hamsters)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(gerbil, be better than hamsters)