gerbil: bite cage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.65
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, pet
Weight: 0.55
, cat
Weight: 0.46
, reptile
Weight: 0.46
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.35
, hamster
Weight: 0.35
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.35
, llama
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
bite cage 1.00
chew on cage 0.92
bite tails 0.83
chew tail 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hamster, bite cage)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hamster, chew on cage)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(hamster, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(hamster, bite cage)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(hamster, chew on cage)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(hamster, chew on cage)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(gerbil, bite cage)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, chew on cage)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(gerbil, chew on cage)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, chew tail)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(gerbil, chew tail)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(gerbil, chew tail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(gerbil, chew on cage)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(gerbil, chew tail)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(gerbil, chew on cage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, bite cage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(gerbil, bite cage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(hamster, bite cage)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hamster, chew on cage)