gerbil: has physical part whiskers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.65
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, pet
Weight: 0.55
, cat
Weight: 0.46
, reptile
Weight: 0.46
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.35
, hamster
Weight: 0.35
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.35
, llama
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part whiskers 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.84
has physical part tails 0.82
has physical part eyes 0.82
have long teeth 0.78
have yellow teeth 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(rodent, have yellow teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part tails)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part eyes)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part eyes)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hamster, has physical part whiskers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(spider monkey, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(llama, has physical part teeth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hamster, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hamster, has physical part teeth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hamster, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(rodent, have yellow teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(hamster, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(hamster, has physical part whiskers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hamster, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(hamster, has physical part teeth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hamster, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hamster, has physical part eyes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(llama, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(llama, has physical part teeth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hamster, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hamster, has physical part tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(spider monkey, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(spider monkey, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have yellow teeth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part teeth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(gerbil, have yellow teeth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(gerbil, has physical part tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part teeth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(gerbil, have yellow teeth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(gerbil, has physical part teeth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part eyes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gerbil, have yellow teeth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gerbil, have long teeth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part teeth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(gerbil, has physical part eyes)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part eyes)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(gerbil, has physical part eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part eyes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hamster, has physical part whiskers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(llama, has physical part teeth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hamster, has physical part teeth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(spider monkey, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hamster, has physical part eyes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hamster, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part tails)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part eyes)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gerbil, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)