gerbil: run

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.65
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, pet
Weight: 0.55
, cat
Weight: 0.46
, reptile
Weight: 0.46
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.35
, hamster
Weight: 0.35
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.35
, llama
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
run 1.00
run in wheels 0.78
run on wheels 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(rodent, run in wheels)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(gerbil, run)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(rodent, run on wheels)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(gerbil, run)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(rodent, run in wheels)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(rodent, run on wheels)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rodent, run in wheels)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(rodent, run on wheels)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hamster, run on wheels)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(rodent, run in wheels)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(gerbil, run)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(rodent, run on wheels)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(gerbil, run)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(hamster, run on wheels)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(hamster, run on wheels)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(gerbil, run)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, run in wheels)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, run on wheels)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(gerbil, run on wheels)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(gerbil, run on wheels)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(gerbil, run in wheels)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(gerbil, run in wheels)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(gerbil, run on wheels)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(gerbil, run in wheels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, run)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(gerbil, run)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(rodent, run in wheels)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(rodent, run on wheels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hamster, run on wheels)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(rodent, run in wheels)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(gerbil, run)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(rodent, run on wheels)