germany: is densely populated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents european union
Weight: 0.73
, europe
Weight: 0.68
, japan
Weight: 0.66
, south korea
Weight: 0.66
, south africa
Weight: 0.65
Siblings britain
Weight: 0.71
, france
Weight: 0.63
, italy
Weight: 0.63
, austria
Weight: 0.59
, netherlands
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
is densely populated 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(japan, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(germany, is densely populated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(europe, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(germany, is densely populated)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(south korea, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(germany, is densely populated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(south korea, is densely populated)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(europe, is densely populated)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(japan, is densely populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(south korea, is densely populated)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(europe, is densely populated)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(japan, is densely populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(netherlands, is densely populated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(japan, is densely populated)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(germany, is densely populated)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(europe, is densely populated)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(germany, is densely populated)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(south korea, is densely populated)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(germany, is densely populated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(netherlands, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(netherlands, is densely populated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(germany, is densely populated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(germany, is densely populated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(germany, is densely populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(south korea, is densely populated)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(europe, is densely populated)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(japan, is densely populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(netherlands, is densely populated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(south korea, is densely populated)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(europe, is densely populated)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(germany, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(japan, is densely populated)