germany: is well developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents european union
Weight: 0.73
, europe
Weight: 0.68
, japan
Weight: 0.66
, south korea
Weight: 0.66
, south africa
Weight: 0.65
Siblings britain
Weight: 0.71
, france
Weight: 0.63
, italy
Weight: 0.63
, austria
Weight: 0.59
, netherlands
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
is well developed 1.00
is developed country 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(europe, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(germany, is well developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(europe, is developed country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(europe, is developed country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(netherlands, is developed country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(france, is developed country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(austria, is developed country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(europe, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(germany, is well developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(netherlands, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(netherlands, is developed country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(austria, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(austria, is developed country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(france, is developed country)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(france, is developed country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(germany, is well developed)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(germany, is developed country)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(germany, is developed country)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(germany, is developed country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(germany, is developed country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(germany, is well developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(germany, is well developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(europe, is developed country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(netherlands, is developed country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(austria, is developed country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(france, is developed country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(germany, is well developed)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(europe, is developed country)